A tale of two dreams....

 

Notes From November

 

Social Science isn't science!

...  Social science isn't science it's a religious cult, and social scientists are more like cult leaders implementing Mass psychosis, psychological warfare disguised as a just and valid cause.

What is the big deal if we let social scientists go around calling themselves scientists even though they are noot?

A large part of the problem here is that words matter and their definitions matter. And once we go around making it acceptable to smudge and redirect definitions, we make it acceptable for others to do the same. This kind of intellectual Anarchy could even spawn something as crazy as people presenting theories as facts. Let's say for instance gender Theory, a definite Theory, not a fact, yet we have an entire country of institutions that find it perfectly acceptable to present this Theory as fact. I think that after the last few years we can all agree that this caused chaos in our society. Definitions are important.

Science by it's very definition involves facts, provable, concrete, set in stone laws that we as a society have all agreed upon. If someone States something as scientific fact and someone else on the other side of the planet proves it not be a scientific fact, through experimentation following the scientific method, evolving then it is no longer science.It may "feel" very scientific, but you have not produced any scientific facts, you have only played science with some data.

I'm here to argue that economics, sociology, psychology and any certain groups of these practice and studied phenomena pertaining to the evolution of the human species cannot in any way be categorized as a science.

First and foremost every human belonging to the species is 'biologically' absolutely unique just like every snowflake , no two could ever be exactly the same. Each of us is from a unique place, with a unique culture, and their own place in the timeline of our species evolution.

Human behavior and the complex interworkings of our society's, tribes and even daily lives, are constantly changing and evolving. As our species evolves over time every generation is naturally an improvement from the last. So, biologically speaking , I am a better faster and smarter creature than my mother, and my daughter is a better faster and smarter creature then I.

There are far too many ever-changing variables to make a controlled experiment even possible. This means that for these so-called experiments that these so-called social scientists do, multiple variables are changing every time. That in itself is not an experiment. If you are unable to isolate your variables and keep them constant you can never repeat the same experiment. If you can never repeat the same experiment then you can never replicate your results.

   

So when it comes down to it, if definitions are important, what you keep calling social science should actually be called social theory. And it actually was just theories until a handful of drunken Frenchman decided to go around creating isms all willy-nilly. Auguste Comte, came out with his positive sociology Theory, which was about as accurate as Reefer Madness. It's accuracy however seemed to be irrelevant, even after multiple philosophers, and scientists from multiple fields, tried feverishly to argue that it was nonsense.

Albert einstein, in an article titled why socialism, argued exactly this. 

Science is a tool for dissecting and understanding the universe around us. Once we properly understand the universe around us we can predict how it will operate. Scientific law is never changing gravity is always gravity. We then as creatures of innovation can you use these laws to then create new forms of technology. Gravity is yes gravity but the Wright brothers somehow found a way to defy gravity.

  It is here that I can add a unique perspective to this argument. Something that I can clearly see over hundreds of years of Scholars, there is an obvious cultural bias to the Western philosophies our current institutions hold. 

Thorstein velden, in his book The Theory of the Leisure Class, tryed to shine a light on this problem. He points out that the wealthy are evolving like a lopsided wheel, their vanity makes it virtually impossible for them to realize their own faults and course correct. 

But even as far back as Frederick Nietzsche in 1888, with the Twilight of Idols how to philosophize with a hammer, our most Brilliant Minds have been trying to course correct our species, but have been blatantly and as I might add now purposely ignored.

IIf all of humanity has lost faith in our institutions, why have we not fixed our institutions?

How and why have einstein, Nietzsche, velbon and hundreds of other brilliant  Minds been completely ignored? 

The answer actually very simple. They have not just been ignored, they have been hidden from you.

So social science, completely lacking the ability to function like science, functions more like a religion or a cult. Just like a religion or a cult, social science, relies heavily on belief and faith for its existence. Social scientist produced by our current Institution also exist in the paradigm of the western world which is suffering that lopsided wheel effect. The religious doctrine that this cult is now following it's very heavily culturally bias, and there is no such thing as course correction, and there never was, furthermore and most importantly there was never meant to be.

And I will say it again... why the f*** do we have a field that calls itself some kind of science, and yet ignores Einstein? Could it possibly be for the same reason that I love him so much?

I know why I love his article why socialism. It is a beautifully poetic description, with Exquisite detail,of his perception of Western society, 

..... We owe our existence to Conquest. 

....  the conquerors set themselves up as the ruling class. 

.... the ruling class created the churches and the schools. 

...... through the church and education they set up a system of values by which the people were unconsciously guided in their social behavior.

..... nowhere have we been able to overcome what thorstein velbin called the predatory phase of human development. 

Albert, is saying from his perspective, Western Society was created by predators, your churches and your schools are all predators, and those predators have been running Western Society, AKA america, as though it were one big MK Ultra experiment, from the very beginning.

Albert, is saying, from his perspective, we currently exist in this predatory phase. The evolution of our species is stuck here in this phase, and we cannot possibly predict what the next phase of evolution is going to be like because we have not yet evolved.

We as a collective species, do not know where we are going to go, we only know where we have been.. Minka Alexander 

It is now time for me to be a little bit in your face, and point out that the reason((it seems )) our species is incapable of evolving past the predatory phase of human development is because our current system in Western Society is designed to do specifically that. 

  

Perhaps, this is the reason why the free Masons, the grand architects of our western society use the symbol of the snake eating its own tale. 

Did these so called "architects" of western "society"  a enormous amount of the human Species, and purposely brainwash us into a paridoxical form of Stockholm syndrome?